;;

Monday, February 5, 2018

With Chief Girt

Police Chief Eric Girt
Recently The Hamiltonian interviewed Clint Twolan, President of  the Hamilton Police Association.   The interview can be found here.  As a follow up to that interview, we asked Chief Girt to comment on some of the things in Mr. Twolan's interview. 

Questions we posed to Chief Girt:

Chief Girt:

1. The following is an excerpt from a recent interview The Hamiltonian conducted with Clint Twolan, President of the Police Association(the interview can be found here http://www.thehamiltonian.net/2018/01/with-clint-twolan-president-of-hamilton.html

The question we asked was: What are some of the more difficult issues that the police association is struggling with. Why are they important, and what would you wish the outcome to be.

Mr. Twolan’s reply was as follows:

Hamilton is a unique City in that we have a variety of policing issues. Theresult is a need for appropriate staffing and in most cases, higherstaffing than other jurisdictions. Despite this, Hamilton remainslow on the number of police officers on a per capita basis.Hamilton also remains below average on the per capita cost ofpolicing. Striking that balance of cost and community safety isalways a challenge for the Chief of Police and their command staffand is something that the Association understands. Still, our focusis on the safety of our officers and their ability to provide theservice our citizens deserve. In order to continue this level ofservice, without question, we require more police officers. TheAssociation’s position is that we are understaffed and have reacheda critical point that must be addressed.

With respect to the part of Mr. Twolan’s statement, when he states : without question, we require more police officers. The Association’s position is that we are understaffed and have reached a critical point that must be addressed., and the dire set of circumstances this statement seems to depict, can we get your response. Do you share his concerns and do you agree with his assessment of the situation. What actions might be taken to address this issue?


2. Upon review of the interview with Mr. Twolan in its entirety, as can be seen here: http://www.thehamiltonian.net/2018/01/with-clint-twolan-president-of-hamilton.html , are there any comments you may have with respect to anything that was said, either in general and/or specific terms?

Chief Girt replied as follows:

Do you share his concerns and do you agree with his assessment of the situation. What actions should be taken to address this issue?

As a service, we are committed to public safety and preventing crime. As you know, we must always strike a balance between cost and community safety. Further, we remain dedicated to preserving the peace and by working with the community we serve. On January 25, 2018, Hamilton Police Service presented the HPS Board-approved budget to the General Issues Committee (GIC) recommending a 2.45 per cent increase in our 2018 Operating Budget. This was approved by both the Police Service Board and the presentation was received by the GIC. The increase means another nine staff members added to the service. These positions are a mix of both sworn police officers and civilians. Moving forward, we will continue to look at the civilianization of policing, as contemplated by Bill 175, Safer Ontario Act, 2017. For example, this year we increased staffing to include six Special Constables to collect and process evidence, which allows us to redeploy six officers back to the streets.

Unfortunately the service as a whole has not reached a point where it can claim to proportionally be reflective of Hamilton’s diversity.

We are proud that as a service, Hamilton Police is one of the best for matching community diversity. According to a 2011 National Household Survey, our service is 17.2 per cent diverse compared to Hamilton’s population, which is 17.7 per cent. This is second best in the country. We continue to work hard to ensure our service is reflective of the community we serve.


Thanks to Chief Girt for engaging with Hamiltonians via The Hamiltonian.

20 comments:

  1. as we all know, the Service must strike a balance between cost and public safety.
    And according to PSB Chair Ferguson, we simply can not afford regular police patrol on the Linc and the RHVP,(arguably our area's most dangerous thoroughfares)
    We can however afford an armoured vehicle.
    Priorities.
    Leadership.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. During our interview Thursday, De Caire maintained the heavy-duty tactical truck had been called into action for strictly operational, not optical reasons.

      "That vehicle is the right vehicle for the right job done by the right people," he said. "And we don't do things as a show of force. We do things that are appropriate and necessary for the evidence we are confronted with."

      According to De Caire, in this instance the bulletproof vehicle hit the street based on intelligence and evidence that it was the necessary piece of equipment to use at the time.

      Story continues below
      There's no reason to doubt his word, of course. But there's also no question its sudden appearance in connection with yet another gun incident had the look and feel of showcase timing.

      Police acquired the truck in 2012 for $280,000. It's made in Newmarket, Ont., by a company named Terradyne Armoured Vehicles, which produces various models. This one weighs in the neighbourhood of 6,800 kilograms (15,000 pounds), has different portals and hatches, and steel-plate deflectors on the bottom.

      De Caire couldn't say how often it's used, but it's there to serve a lot of purposes.

      "We use the vehicle in tactical situations; we use it in high-risk warrant executions; we use it in hostage and barricaded situations; we use it in citizen- and officer-related recovery."

      https://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/5797817-dreschel-police-call-in-their-heavy-equipment/

      Pay for the RHVP/LAE police detail using photo radar along the entire route. I hear it's a cash grab so it may as well have a practical end.

      Papa.Wheelie



      Delete
    2. or make safety a priority

      Monde

      Delete
    3. Agreed. The cause of the problem resides with drivers, as does it's solution.

      Gee Too

      Delete
    4. the cause of the problem is a lack of enforcement.Priorities
      We got a sign, and a bid without a prayer
      At least we tried.
      While children died.
      Duh

      Monde

      Delete
    5. Another vote for photo radar. Merci Monde.

      Papa.Wheelie

      Delete
    6. that would make a total of one...so far.
      (with obvious support from dubious sources on Council)

      Monde

      Delete
    7. yes, those who thought the Amazon's were coming would likely support photo radar,
      and they are likely the same ones who thought a sign to remind us where we live was vital.
      It's a classic no brainer.
      It's the minority fringe.
      Priorities.

      orangemike

      Delete
    8. Photo radar is enforcement, no? You would prefer mannequin cops pointing bar code scanners?

      Just widen the whole route and let the bumper cars slow down traffic.

      Papa.Wheelie

      Delete
    9. women with hair dryers
      police are our last line of defence.

      orangemike

      Delete
    10. Unanimous council support for photo radar on the Red Hill & Linc

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/news/only-speeders-should-fear-photo-radar-in-the-red-hill-and-linc-merulla-1.3358497

      Photo radar is a complement to policing, not a replacement. This is a four-lane parkway almost 20 km long. If you want comparable always-on enforcement along the entire route, that's three eight-hour officer shifts (annual operating cost of $250K, slightly less than the capital cost of the HPS' armoured vehicle) per deployment (on/off ramps complicate things) per direction. How many police officers would you need to staff 78 lane km of asphalt?

      Whatever your number, you still wouldn't eliminate speeding, just enforce penalties in a more timely fashion. And an officer who's writing someone up is essentially offline until that process concludes... and however the ticket is administered, the recipient can always enlist the help of X-Copper to wriggle free.

      Sassoon

      Delete
    11. photo radar is lazy policing,is not a deterrent to speeding, and would do nothing to prevent the loss we have experienced.
      we give them money.....to serve and protect, and they can't afford to regularly patrol the area's most dangerous roadway?
      What is more important than saving young lives?
      Sassoon believes generating revenue is more important.
      Makes sense

      Papa.Wheelie

      Delete
    12. would that be the same Council that unanimously approved the Amazon bid?
      told ya

      Monde

      Delete
    13. 8 hour shifts?
      Hamilton Police abandoned 3 shift rotation....more than a generation ago. Using "Starsky and Hutch" as your reference point is likely a disservice to reasonable debate.

      orangemike

      Delete
    14. Save young lives by knowing that your teenage son is an immature menace who does not deserve the keys to mom's Camaro.

      Chief Girt is in favour of tapping into domestic security cameras to enhance the effectiveness of policing. Maybe the solution is just to install cameras without radar so that police back at headquarters can spot speeders. A dozen officers dedicated to the Parkways 24/7 (would cost another $1M a year. Bake it into the HPS budget and sell it to council. Easy.

      If the road is dangerous because of speed, drop the speed limit by 20-30 km/h and make everyone safer and speeders easier to spot. though in point of fact, police cannot stop accidents from happening.

      BTW, I don't shop at Starsky & Hutch but I gather that it's near one of the Red Hill off-ramps.

      Sassoon

      Delete
    15. BTW its my daughter that is the real menace, she hasn't been afforded much in the way of role models.

      I think one (1) officer(per shift),committed exclusively to patrolling the Linc and RHVP 24/7 would have significant positive impact on road safety.

      Parking-stationing-their vehicle at strategic locations throughout the day would send a loud message that would resonate quickly....not here, not anymore.
      The ability to connect with CCTV camera's placed at intervals along the route via onboard blu-tooth technology would afford quick responses and accurate intelligence.
      And no more road side discretion.

      All could have been accomplished for the price of say.....an Amazon bid?
      Imagine a return on the dollar.
      Imagine Police protecting us.

      BTW, I shop at Gilbert's. Great shop, nice people.

      Sassoon

      Delete
  2. It's all about how safe you think you can afford to be.
    Sorce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/halton-police-report-1.4404934

      Rimshot

      Delete
  3. better to focus Police attention on writing tickets in the core than saving lives on the Linc.
    makes sense.

    Papa.Wheelie

    ReplyDelete
  4. street checks have been all but eliminated....
    while shootings have quadrupled in just 4 years.

    Some-guess who-are insulted by the suggestion of a direct causal link.

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please abide by the blog's policy on posting. This blog facilitates discussion from all sides of issues. Opposite viewpoints are welcome, provided they are respectful. Name calling is not allowed and any posts that violate the policy, will not be authorized to appear. This blog also reserves the right to exclude comments that are off topic or are otherwise unprofessional. This blog does not assume any liability whatsoever for comments posted. People posting comments or providing information on interviews, do so at their own risk.

This blog believes in freedom of speech and operates in the context of a democratic society, which many have fought and died for.

Views expressed by commentators or in articles that appear here, cannot be assumed to be espoused by The Hamiltonian staff or its publisher.